9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (12) TMI 1594X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... br>SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN For the Appellant : Mr. B. R. Mittal, Advocate Mr. Aneesh Mittal, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Manmeet Singh Arora, S.P.P. ORDER MP-PBPT-335/LKW/2019 (Stay) & FPA-PBPT-432/LKW/2019 Counsels for both sides are present. It is contended by the Ld. counsel for the appellant that the show cause notice dated 18.10.2019 has been issued under the provision ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cating Authority then the appellant move before this Tribunal for an appropriate order. The appellant has already filed the stay application alongwith the appeal vide M.A. No. 335/LKW/2019. On the other hand, counsel for the respondent submits that in view of Section 27 of the PBPT Act, 1988 so long as the appeal is pending, no confiscation of the property can be done without issuing a proper sho ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... facie case that the operation of the impugned order be stayed till the next date of hearing. It is clarified that this order will not come in the way if any prosecution case is filed. Reply is not on record. The counsel for the respondent has undertaken to file the same in the registry during the course of the day. The copy of the same has been served on other side. The counsel for the appellan ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
