2017 (3) TMI 1897

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... OR, Mr. K. Ravi, Adv., Mr. R. Murugan, Adv., Ms. T. Archana, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv., Mr. Krishna Srinivas, Adv., Ms. Geethi Ara, Adv., Mr. P. Dwarakesh, Adv., Mr. S. Sukumaran, Adv., Mr. Anand Sukumar, Adv., Mr. Bhupesh Kumar Pathak, Adv., Ms. Meera Mathur, AOR, Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv., Ms. Rohini Musa, AOR, Mr. Zaffar Inayat, Adv. O R D E R Leave granted. W .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , 9, 13, 14, 16, 17 and 18 and Respondent Nos. 4 and 7 should be added as parties and the appellant shall be at liberty to argue on the grounds in the said Petition and the prayer regarding the alleged mis-management of the companies in question in case the corporate veil is lifted. The Section 397/398 Petition is maintainable as the appellant holds 10% of the share capital in the holding company. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X