TMI Blog2022 (11) TMI 342X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... >2022 (11) TMI 342 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT - 2023 (70) G. S. T. L. 138 (M. P.) X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mated amount determined by the Designated Committee. Accordingly, vide Annexure R/3 Form No.SVLDRS 3 dated 13.12.2019 the petitioner was directed to deposit the discounted amount of Rs.3,31,925/-. 2.1 The petitioner did not come forward to deposit the said amount till the last extended date prescribed i.e. 30/06/2020. 3 . The claim put up before this Court is that some amount of tax was deposite ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... thin 30 days. In that view of the matter, the High Court has rightly refused to grant relief to the petitioner for extension of the period to make the deposit under the Scheme. It is a settled proposition of law that a person, who wants to avail the benefit of a particular Scheme has to abide by the terms and conditions of the Scheme scrupulously. If the time is extended not provided under the S ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|