TMI Blog2022 (1) TMI 1294X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion 60(1) being the NCLT, the Application filed by the Appellant was fully maintainable and could not have been rejected only on the ground that no CIRP or Liquidation Proceeding of the Corporate Debtor are pending before the NCLT. The Application filed by the Appellant under Section 95(1) of the Code is revived before the NCLT which may be proceeded in accordance with the law. Appeal allowed. - Company Appeal (AT) Insolvency No. 60 of 2022, Company Appeal (AT) Insolvency No. 61 of 2022 - - - Dated:- 27-1-2022 - Justice Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson and Dr. Alok Srivastava Member (Technical) For the Appellant: Malvika Trivedi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Akash Tandon, Mr. Ashish Chudhury, Santosh Kumar, Bhargavi Kannar, Akanksha Trip ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... isfied in the present case, at this point of time CP(IB)/230/KB/2021 is premature and is dismissed as such. 3. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that NCLT has not correctly interpreted Section 60(2) of the Code. It is submitted that Application was fully maintainable under Section 60(1) of the Code despite there being no pendency of any Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process in National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT in short). 4. Learned Counsel for the Respondent refuting the submissions of Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that Section 60(2) of the Code clearly provides that Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP in short) and Liquidation Process if pending before the NCLT, an Application relating to the Corpor ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ersonal guarantors shall be the NCLT. The Sub-Section 2 of Section 60 requires that where a CIRP or Liquidation Process of the Corporate Debtor is pending before a National Company Law Tribunal the application relating to CIRP of the Corporate Guarantor or Personal Guarantor as the case may be of such Corporate Debtor shall be filed before such National Company Law Tribunal. The purpose and object of the sub-section 2 of Section 60 of the Code is that when proceedings are pending in a National Company Law Tribunal, any proceeding against Corporate Guarantor should also be filed before such National Company Law Tribunal. The idea is that both proceedings be entertained by one and the same NCLT. The sub-section 2 of Section 60 does no ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n a particular case is not covered under Section 60(2) the Application as referred to in sub-section (1) of Section 60 can be very well filed in the NCLT having territorial jurisdiction over the place where the Registered Office of corporate Person is located. 11. The Adjudicating Authority erred in holding that since no CIRP or Liquidation Proceeding of the Corporate Debtor are pending the application under Section 95(1) filed by the Appellant is not maintainable. The Application having been filed under Section 95(1) and the Adjudicating Authority for application under Section 95(1) as referred in Section 60(1) being the NCLT, the Application filed by the Appellant was fully maintainable and could not have been rejected only on the grou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
