2015 (2) TMI 1384

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Member and Shri George Mathan, Judicial Member Shri J.P. Khaitan, Advocate, for the Applicant Shri Sanjay, ACIT, Sr. D.R., for the Respondent O R D E R Per Shri George Mathan, Judicial Member : These are Miscellaneous Applications filed by the assessee against the order of the Tribunal in IT(S.S.)A Nos. 35 to 39/Kol/2013 dated 17.01.2014 for the assessment years 2004-05 to 2008-09. 2. Sh .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for each assessment year. It was the submission that the Tribunal had not decided the issue of the addition representing the undisclosed turnover. It was the submission that this required clarification. It was the submission that this clarification sought for may be granted to the assessee as to whether the addition representing the undisclosed turnover had been deleted or not. 4. In reply, ld. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d @ 10%, for the assessment year 2005-06 @ 12.5%, for the assessment year 2006-07 @ 15%, for the assessment year 2007-08 @ 20% and for the assessment year 2008-09 @ 25%". The words used in the order are clearly profit for the assessment year. Having specifically adjudicated the issue of the profit for the assessment year, now the claim of the assessee for further clarifications is nothing but rev .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X