TMI Blog2016 (12) TMI 1889X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the argument of the petitioner was to be considered, on account of the impracticability involved, it would be only a futile exercise. In that view of the matter, the order of the lower Court does not call for any interference. Therefore, this civil revision petition is liable to be dismissed. This civil revision petition is dismissed. - CRP No. 1698 of 2016 - - - Dated:- 23-12-2016 - Chall ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... such aspect. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner places reliance upon Paragraph 10 of the judgment of the Supreme Court in T. Nagappa v. Y.R. Muralidhar, 2008 (1) ALD (Crl.) 927 (SC) : AIR 2008 SC 2010, whereunder, in similar circumstances, the Application of this nature came to be allowed. 3. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the respondent, apart from the judgment in Union of India ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... h document to the experts is only a futile exercise. Learned Counsel for the respondent also submits that the judgment dated 19.3.2010 in S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 2033 of 2010 filed by N. Ayyasamy against R. Jagadeesan, the judgment in R. Jagadeesan's case (supra), stands confirmed on account of the dismissal of the said S.L.P. It may also be noticed that in R. Jagadeesan's case (supra), the judg ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
