TMI Blog2023 (3) TMI 1059X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hawla and his wife Shipra Chawla have already been granted bail and accused/ applicant is no more required in the investigation - HELD THAT:- Having gone through the record while there is no denial to the fact that accused/applicant is in judicial custody, however as per Senior Standing Counsel appearing for DGGI investigation in the matter is still going on as stated in para 5 of the reply of th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ail. It is submitted on behalf of the accused that accused has clean antecedents and has been the sole bread earner in the family. Department (DGGI) Delhi Zonal Unit had conducted search in the office premises of M/s Shankar Trading Company on 03.02.2023 and thereafter search was conducted at the residence of the accused/applicant. All the documents have already been seized as is evident from panc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ply of goods. Officers of DGGI analyzed the data of such firms and thereafter a search was conducted at registered premises of 20 such firms including at principal place of business of M/s Shankar Trading Company and M/s Hindustan Paper Machinery Industries on 03.02.2023. As per DGGI DZU many documents/evidence were recovered and accused/applicant in his statement dated 03.02.2023, 04.02.2023 as w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nhance as investigation is still progressing and other persons involved in the racket who have flowed approximately Rs.315 crores through fake firm accounts. 5. It is submitted by ld. Counsel for the accused that main accused in this case namely Rajiv Chawla and his wife Shipra Chawla have already been granted bail and accused/ applicant is no more required in the investigation. 6. Ld. Sr. S ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... wla who has already been granted bail on 17.02.2023. Moreover perusal of order dated 17.02.2023 of granting bail to accused Rajiv Chawla would show that in that case this court had considered the provisions of Section 6(2)(b) of CGST Act as there were multiple actions initiated by different agencies under the CGST. Such is not the position in this case. Therefore application stands dismissed. C ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
