Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2023 (3) TMI 1275

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... HELD THAT:- It is seen that for the period prior to 01.07.12, the service provided by the appellant would be covered within the exclusion clause of the definition of works contract service since the service provided by the appellant to DMRC is with respect to metro (which is covered within the purview of Railways). This issue was also decided in favour of the appellant in CCE, JAIPUR-I VERSUS M.M. CONSTRUCTIONS, KIRAN UDYOG (KIRAN INFRA ENGS. LTD.) AND KIRAN INFRA ENGGS., M.M. CONSTRUCTIONS, ALCATEL PORTUGAL S.S. (NOW KNOWN AS THALES PORTUGAL SA) VERSUS CCE, JAIPUR/DELHI [ 2017 (1) TMI 1385 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI] where it was held that works contract service provided to Indian Railways as well as DMRC are excluded for tax liability. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed by Exchange Control Department of the Reserve Bank of India [RBI] for the purpose of executing the contract entered into with the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation [DMRC]. It, along with M/s Alstom Transport S.A., M/s Alstom Transport Ltd. (India) and Sumitomo Corporation, entered into a consortium for execution of the turnkey contract with DMRC for design, manufacture, supply, installation, testing and commissioning of Train Control Signaling and Telecommunications Systems-SYS 1 for Delhi MRTS-Phase One. It claimed that the said contract was a composite works contract involving supply of goods as well as services. 3. An investigation was conducted, whereafter it was observed that it had failed to pay service tax in respect of various se .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 2012-13 4. The two show cause notices involved in this appeal are dated 23.10.2012 and 21.04.2014 and following allegations have been made against the appellant: (i) The services provided to DMRC with respect to Cost Centre A (Preliminaries and General Requirements) and Cost Centre B (Detailed Design) is classifiable under the taxable category of consulting engineer service ; and (ii) The services provided by the appellant to DMRC with respect to Cost Centre D (Installation and Site Testing) and Cost Centre E (System Acceptance Test and Integrated Testing Commissioning) is classifiable under the taxable category of erection, commissioning or installation services . 5. The demand proposed in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... elhi] and M/s Alcatel Portugal S.A. (now Known as M/s Thales Portugal SA) V/s CST, Delhi [ 2017 (5) TMI 1088-CESTAT, New Delhi] 8. Shri Rajeev Kapoor, learned authorized representative appearing for the Department, however, supported the impugned order and submitted that it does not call for any interference in this appeal. 9. It is seen that for the period prior to 01.07.12, the service provided by the appellant would be covered within the exclusion clause of the definition of works contract service since the service provided by the appellant to DMRC is with respect to metro (which is covered within the purview of Railways). This issue was also decided in favour of the appellant in the aforesaid two decisions in the appellant s ow .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... g Pvt. Ltd. - 2016 (43) STR 547 (Tribunal-Delhi) and in case of Kumagai Skanska HCC Itochou Group Vs. CST, Delhi Final Order No.53833/2015 dated 28.12.2015. As such, works contract service provided to Indian Railways as well as DMRC are excluded for tax liability 10. In view of the above discussions and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Larsen Toubro Ltd. (supra), the impugned orders confirming service tax liability on the appellants/assessees are legally not sustainable. Accordingly, the same are set aside. The appeals by the appellants/assessees are allowed. 10. For the period post 30.06.2012, the service rendered by the appellant would be covered under Serial No. 14 of the Exemption Notification date .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates