Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

No refund if demand overlaps for the same period unless refund amount is substantiated from demand

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... No refund if demand overlaps for the same period unless refund amount is substantiated from demand - By: - CA Bimal Jain - Service Tax - Dated:- 13-6-2023 - - The CESTAT, Chennai in the case of M/S. BHARAT CYLINDERS VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF GST CENTRAL EXCISE, MADURAI - 2023 (6) TMI 465 - CESTAT CHENNAI held that if refund overlaps with the period for which the demand has been confirm, the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... assessee will be eligible for refund only when the demand would be set aside. Facts: M/s. Bharat Cylinders ( the Appellant ) is inter alia providing goods transport agency services ( GTA services ). The Appellant being a service provider transported cylinders to the bottling unit and mistakenly paid service tax under forward charge in the year 2010, since in case of GTA services t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he recipient of service is liable to pay GST. The Appellant filed refund claim of INR 54,736/- for the period January 2010 to December 2010. However, the Adjudicating Authority rejected the refund claim. Aggrieved by rejection Order the Appellant filed an Appeal before the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Madurai who vide Order-in-Appeal No. 125/2013 dated September 30, 2013 ( the Imp .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ugned Order ) rejected the appeal of the Appellant. Aggrieved by the Impugned Order the Appellant filed an appeal before the CESTAT, Chennai. Before the CESTAT, the Revenue contended that the Appellant is not eligible for refund since, the demand against the Appellant related to GTA service for the period October 01, 2009 to September 30, 2010. Since, the refund period overlaps with the dem .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and period, the Appellant is not eligible for refund unless the demand for such period is set aside. Issue: Whether the Appellant can claim refund for the period which overlaps with the demand period? Held: The CESTAT in M/S. BHARAT CYLINDERS VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF GST CENTRAL EXCISE, MADURAI - 2023 (6) TMI 465 - CESTAT CHENNAI held as under: Noted that, the Appel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lant was not able to differentiate the amount on which the demand order not applies. Held that, the period involve in the present appeal overlaps with the period for which the demand has been confirmed and therefore appellant is not eligible for any refund. (Author can be reached at info@a2ztaxcorp.com ) - - Scholarly articles for knowledge sharing authors experts professi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... onals Tax Management India - taxmanagementindia - taxmanagement - taxmanagementindia.com - TMI - TaxTMI - TMITax .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates