9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (1) TMI 1717X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... alve, learned Senior Counsel and Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioners. Issue notice. 2. As Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned Additional Solicitor General for the States of Gujarat and Rajasthan and Mr. Anil Grover, learned Counsel for the State of Haryana have entered appearance on caveat, no further notice need be issued to them. 3. Issue notice to other Respondents fixing a returnable date within four weeks. 4. The present writ petition fundamentally assails the notification/order, issued by the two States, viz., State of Gujarat and State of Rajasthan, on 13.01.2018 and 17.01.2018 respectively prohibiting the exhibition of the film, namely, 'Padmavat'. 5. Be it noted, though the notification issued by the Government of Gujarat has been brought on record, we have been handed over a copy of the order issued by the Government of Rajasthan. Mr. Anil Grover, learned Counsel appearing for State of Haryana has stated, the State has, on principle, taken a decision not to exhibit the film in cinema halls though the said decision has not yet culminated in a formal order. 6. It has been submitted by Mr. Harish Salve and Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned Senior Counse ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Sd/- (K.L. Patel) Joint Secretary to Government. 9. The State of Rajasthan has issued an order which is to the following effect: "GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN HOME (GR. 6) DEPARTMENT F. 14(3) Home-6/2013 Part Dated: 17th January, 2018 ORDER WHEREAS the Government of Rajasthan considers it necessary so to do in public interest and to maintain the law and order situation in the State of Rajasthan. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 7 of the Rajasthan Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1952 (Act No. XXX of 1952) (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the Government of Rajasthan hereby imposes ban on the exhibition of Hindi feature film 'Padmavat' (earlier named 'Padmavati') produced by Viacom 18 Motion Pictures and Bhansali Productions Pvt. Ltd., within the jurisdiction of the State of Rajasthan. (1) This ban on exhibition of the film shall come into effect from the date of publication of this order. (2) No cinema owner or distributor shall exhibit the said movie in any Cinema/Multiplex/Video Cinema/Touring Cinema etc., within the jurisdiction of the State of Rajasthan. By order and in the name of Govern ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... particular State. This view that we have taken is also fortified from the use of the word "suspension" in the said section. 19. The word "suspension" envisages something functional or something which is being shown or is running. Suspension is always a temporary phase, which gets obliterated as and when the previous position is restored. Therefore, the power as vested Under Section 6 of the Act could not have been exercised by the State of Uttar Pradesh in view of the fact that the said film was not being exhibited publicly in the theatre halls in U.P. Consequently, at this stage, when the film is not screened or exhibited in the theatre halls publicly and for public viewing, neither an opinion could be formed nor could any decision be taken that there is a likelihood of breach of peace by exercising power purported to be Under Section 6 of the Act. 20. The counsel appearing for the State has also submitted that in fact the film already is being exhibited in the State of Uttar Pradesh as a High-Level Committee has seen the film. We cannot accept the aforesaid position as the expression specifically uses the words "publicly exhibited" meaning thereby that it is being exhibited ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e State of the power to prohibit the exhibition of a film. He has drawn our attention to Section 5B of the Act which is as follows: 5B. Principles for guidance in certifying films.-(1) A film shall not be certified for public exhibition if, in the opinion of the authority competent to grant the certificate, the film or any part of it is against the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, or involves defamation or contempt of court or is likely to incite the commission of any offence. (2) Subject to the provisions contained in Sub-section (1), the Central Government may issue such directions as it may think fit setting out the principles which shall guide the authority competent to grant certificates under this Act in sanctioning films for public exhibition. That apart, he has also drawn our attention to Section 7 of the Rajasthan Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1952 which reads as follows: 7. Power to suspend exhibition of films in certain cases - (1) The State Government in respect of the whole or any part of the State of Rajasthan and the District Magistrate in respe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... (vii) human sensibilities are not offended by vulgarity, obscenity or depravity;... ... ... ... (ix) scenes degrading or denigrating women in any manner are not presented; ... ..... ... (xii) visuals or words contemptuous of racial, religious or other groups are not presented; (xiii) visuals or words which promote communal, obscurantist, anti-scientific and anti-national attitudes are not presented; ... ..... ... (xvii) public order is not endangered; It has to be borne in mind, expression of an idea by any one through the medium of cinema which is a public medium has its own status under the Constitution and the Statute. There is a Censor Board under the Act which allows grant of certificate for screening of the movies. As we scan the language of the Act and the guidelines framed thereunder it prohibits use and presentation of visuals or words contemptuous of racial, religious or other groups. Be that as it may. As advised at present once the Certificate has been issued, there is prima facie a presumption that the concerned authority has taken into account all the guidelines including public order. 15. Mr. Mehta would urge that grant of an interim order would tanta ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
