Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

rule 35 of cgst is registration mandatory

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... My query is from 18.07.22, stem cell banking service has been brought under GST ambit under Health Care Services. client have not registered under gst and not collected gst from 18.07.2022 to 31.01.2023. Now client want to pay gst, for for this I have applied Rule 35 of CGST Rules by including the gst portion in the turnover collected. But the department officials objecting that since registra .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tion is not done during that period. Rule 35 cannot be applied. pls clarify me that whether gst registration is mandatory for application of rule 35 - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = Sh.Nayaz Shaik Ji, What is the date of registration with GST department ? Do you want cum-tax benefit for the period prior to registration bu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t after getting registration ? - Reply By nayaz shaik - The Reply = sir registration done on 14.02.2023. But we need to pay gst from 18.07.2022 to 31.01.2023. I need cum tax benefit for the period prior to registration. - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = Q. Whether gst registration is mandatory for application of Rule 35 of CGST Rules ? Ans. Registration is not mandatory in this .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... scenario for claiming cum-tax benefit. You are claiming cum-tax benefit for the period prior to the date of registration but only after getting registered. The cum-tax benefit cannot be denied. - Reply By nayaz shaik - The Reply = sir, can you please refer any article , corresponding section and rules in this regard. - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = Sh.Nayaz Shaik Ji, (i) Rul .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e 35 of CGST Rules does not talk of 'the value is deemed to be inclusive of GST'. (ii) Non-registration is not a hurdle. Your books of account should prove that tax was not collected. (Being unregistered, tax cannot be collected but sometimes it happens that terms and conditions of the contract indicate that prices are inclusive of tax, duty etc.). (iii) Corresponding Section in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... GST is Section 33 of CGST Act and in erstwhile Finance Act, 1994 (Service Tax law) is Section 67 (2) (iv) GST laws are still in their infancy. You will not find any case law on this issue in GST regime. However, case law and Board's circular( based on the judgement of hon'ble Supreme Court ) pertaining to pre-GST period are as under :- Valuation (Central Excise) Cum-d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... uty price Assessable value to be arrived after deducting duty element Circular No. 803/36/2004-CX., dated 27-12-2004 Valuation (Central Excise) Assessable value to be arrived after deducting duty element from cum-duty price The Supreme Court Bench comprising Hon ble Mr. Justice N. Santosh Hegde, Hon ble Mr. Justice Shivaraj V. Patil and Hon ble Mr. Justice B.P. Singh on 9-12-20 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 04 after condoning the delay, dismissed the Review Petition (Civil) No. 75/2003 in C.A. No. 3783 of 2000 with R.P. (C) Nos. 76-85/2003 in C.A. Nos. 660, 3841 5867-5868 of 2000, 4082, 4455, 6072, 8455, and 3913 of 2001 and 92 of 2002, R.P. (C) No. 1054/2003 in C.A. No. 5368 of 2002, R.P. (C) Nos. 116-117/2003 in C.A. Nos. 5862-5863 of 1999, R.P. (C) No. 1170/2003 in C.A. No. 1833/2002, C.A. No. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 2602/2004, C.A. Nos. 6795-6797/2004, C.A. No. 7450-7452 of 2003. The Review Petition (Civil) No. 75/2003 in C.A. No. 3783/2000 with other appeals was filed against the Supreme Court judgment and order dated 27-2-2002 as reported in 2002 (141) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.) ( Commissioner v. Maruti Udyog Ltd. ). R.P. (C) No. 1054/2003 in C.A. Nos. 5368/2002 was filed against the Apex Court Order dated 3- .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 9-2002 as reported in 2003 (151) E.L.T. A306 (S.C.) ( Commissioner v. Supreme Fabrics (P) Ltd. ). R.P. (C) Nos. 116-117/2003 in C.A. Nos. 5862-5863/1999 was filed against the Supreme Court Order dated 26-2-2002 as reported in 2002 (142) E.L.T. A279 (S.C.) ( Collector v. Srichakra Tyres Ltd. ). C.A. Nos. 6795-6797/2004 was filed against the CESTAT Order Nos. A/489-491/2004-NB(B), da .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ted 15-3-2004 as reported in 2004 (171) E.L.T. 343 (Tri. - Del.) ( Vasundhara Containers Pipes (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner ). While dismissing the review petitions and appeals, the Supreme Court held as follows :- Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Delay condoned. The review petitions and civil appeals are dismissed. C.A. Nos. 6795-6797/2004 : Taken on board. Heard .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... learned Counsel for the parties. The civil appeals are dismissed. The Supreme Court and the CESTAT in their impugned orders had held that the sale price which is charged is deemed to be the value for the purpose of levy of excise duty, but the element of excise duty, sales tax or other taxes which are included in the wholesale price are to be excluded in arriving at the assessable value. Th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... at means, that the cum-duty price when charged, then in arriving at the excisable value, the element of duty which is payable has to be excluded. [ Commissioner v. Maruti Udyog - 2004 (12) TMI 669 - SC ORDER ] - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = In continuation of my reply, it is added that the above case laws will be valid in GST regime also. - Reply By Padmanathan Kollengode .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... - The Reply = When department is alleging that impugned activity is taxable from 18-7-2022 to 31-02-2023, and it is not disputed that GST has not been collected separately, then the amount collected by assessee is inclusive of GST. Rule 35 benefit cannot be denied in your case. - rule 35 of cgst is registration mandatory - Query Started By: - nayaz shaik Dated:- 21-8-2023 Last Replied Da .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... te:- 8-9-2023 Goods and Services Tax - GST - Got 7 Replies - GST - Discussion Forum - Knowledge Sharing, reply post by an expert, personal opinion Tax Management India - taxmanagementindia - taxmanagement - taxmanagementindia.com - TMI - TaxTMI - TMITax .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates