TMI Blog2023 (10) TMI 682X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 1 September 2023. However, while reserving orders, the NCLAT has directed the parties to maintain status quo as was available prior to EOGM dated 03.05.2019 till the judgement is delivered. No reasons have been indicated by the NCLAT even prima facie for issuing the interim order, particularly in the context of the fact that there was no interim relief operating since the dismissal of the applic ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hil Suri, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Agrawal, AOR Mr. Kunal Mehta, Adv. CA 6176/2023 Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Ms. Geetika Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shashwat Singh, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, AOR For the Respondent : Mr. Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Amit Jajoo, Adv. Mr. Malak Manish Bh ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ndicated by the NCLAT even prima facie for issuing the interim order, particularly in the context of the fact that there was no interim relief operating since the dismissal of the application for interim relief on 31 December 2019. It is admitted that no relief was obtained by the first respondent in the proceedings before the Bombay High Court, as well. 3 In the circumstances, we vacate the in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|