9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (11) TMI 975X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Justice Krishnan Ramasamy For the Petitioner : Mr.Joseph Prabakar For the Respondent : Mr.V.Sundareswaran, Senior Standing counsel ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order passed by the respondent on 17.06.2013. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that at paragraph No.3 of the order dated 26.03.2013 in W.A.No.426 of 2013 passed by the Hon' ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ate on which the order was passed) and dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner vide the said impugned order on the ground that it is barred by limitation. 4. Further, he would submit that the order copy of the writ appeal was received by the petitioner only on 26.04.2013 and in the said order copy, only two dates are available, one is 26.03.2013 (the date on which the order was passed) and a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ;ble Division Bench, it has been mentioned that the appeal should be filed by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today, i.e., 26.03.2013 (the date of passing of the said order). However, since the petitioner had filed the said appeal only on 29.04.2013, the respondent had dismissed the appeal as it is barred by limitation. 6. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the resp ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... "today" mentioned in the said order refers to the date on which the order copy was issued to the petitioner. Hence, in the present case, since, the order copy was received by the petitioner only on 25.04.2013, the appeal, which was filed on 29.04.2013, was filed well within the period of limitation prescribed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court. 9. From the above discussion, the subm ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
