TMI Blog2022 (1) TMI 1409X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or the appellant, the Departmental Representative also sent a letter dated 13.12.2021 including additional submissions received from Air Cargo (Export), New Delhi vide their letters dated 12.12.2021 and 13.12.2021. A perusal of those documents shows that the ownership of subject goods were a matter of dispute before the Dept Recovery Appellate Tribunal according to which the goods do not belong to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... are directed to provide the aforesaid letters to the opposite side - matter thereafter be re-heard and compliance matter on 4th April, 2022. - Hon ble Mr. P V Subba Rao, Member (Technical) And Hon ble Ms. Rachna Gupta, Member (Judicial) For the Appellant : Shri Nishant Mishra and Shri Prakash Shah, Advocates. For the Respondent: Shri Shashi Shekhar, Authorised Representative. O ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of Customs Air Cargo Export are, in fact, not inclined to comply with the directions passed by this Tribunal. Learned Counsel also submitted that no stay order has been issued by Allahabad High Court where the appeal of Department against the final order of this Tribunal is pending consideration; appropriate action was requested by the appellant. Learned Counsel had also requested for time to pla ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... appellant had exported the goods but who has not cleared them from customs) and that M/s Vee Ess Jewellers have hypothecated them to State Bank of India. Along with these documents vide the aforesaid letter Authorised Representative has also submitted that allowing the re-export will frustrate the claims of the contending parties on the title of the goods . 3. In view of the above, we deemed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
