Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2023 (12) TMI 796

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sment ordered by the department. ii. The dispute about country of origin whether the same is Singapore or UAE where the appellant has not claimed any preferential rate of duty. iii. Enhancement of declared value twice, from USD 500 PMT(C &F Kandla) to USD 531.500 PMT(C & F Kandla) and therefore, further enhancement to USD 585 on the basis of the copy of invoice received from shipping agent. 1.1 The brief facts of the case are that the appellant filed Bill of Entry No. 7638694 dated 11.08.2012 with Custom House, Kandla for clearance of 198 MT Rubber Processing Oil for assessment on first check basis. The appellant has classified goods under CTH 27101990. The appellant presented Quality Certificate No. TOP 2012/COQ-148 dated 28.08.2012 r .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dated 23.09.2013 whereby the following order was passed:- i. Classification of goods is held under CTH1707 9900. ii. The country of origin as UAE was rejected and the same was held to be Malaysia. iii. The value of 198 MT of Rubber Processing Oil (RPO) declared in Bill of Entry No. 7638694 dated 11.08.2012 USD 500 PMT was rejected and redetermined the same USD 585 PMT. Ordered for confiscation of Rubber Processing Oil with the option for redemption on payment of fine of Rs. 5,00,000/-, ordered for payment of differential duty amounting to Rs. 24,74,446/- and the same was ordered to be adjusted and appropriate from the amount of Rs. 1491186/- which was already paid by the appellant. Penalty of Rs. 24,74,446/- was imposed under Section .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... orts -2003 (161) ELT 443 (Tri. -Kol) 3. On the other hand Shri Ajay Kumar Samota, learned Superintendent (AR) appearing on behalf of the revenue reiterates the finding of the impugned order. 4. We have carefully considered submissions made by both the sides, and perused the rerecords. In the present appeal, issue to be decided by us in the appeal filed by M/s. Amit Petrolubes Pvt Ltd are as under :- i. Classification of Rubber Processing Oil (RPO) ii. Country of origin of said goods iii. Enhancement of declared value twice. 4.1. As regards classification of Rubber Processing Oil (RPO), we find that was held by the revenue under CTH 27079900 treating the parameters of aromatic constituents is 50% i.e. more than non-aromatic constitu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oresaid Tribunal Judgment which was upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, we hold that the appellant's imported goods Rubber Processing Oil (RPO) is correctly classified under CTH 27101990 and not under CTH 2707 9900 as proposed by the revenue. 4.4. As regard the issue of country of origin, we find that the appellant had placed order with Oceanic Petroleum Source Pvt. Ltd, Singapore, who had shipped the goods from Malasiya. The Country of origin was shown in the invoice as UAE. The same was held as Malasiya by the lower authority, by relying on statement of Shri Hemant Shah, Director of appellant. We find that, it is submitted that the appellant has not claimed any preferential rate of duty on the basis of declaration regarding country .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 631 dated 12.07.2012 for the subject goods confirming that freight was pre-paid. Therefore, when the freight is pre-paid and inclusive in the price, there is no requirement to add element of freight @20% for USD 585. 4.9. It is also observed that about the aforesaid invoice produced by the shipping line, the appellant had no knowledge and it is not also known when such invoice was produced before custom authority at the port of export. Hence, we are of the view that, it cannot be said that the same represent true and correct transaction value. Moreover, it is admitted fact that, no evidence was placed on record to show any extra payment made by the appellant over and above declared value USD 500 PMT C & F Kandla. No Contemporaneous import .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates