9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (3) TMI 225X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... (C) No. 24145/2019 (IV-B) SLP(C) No. 27179/2019 (IV-B) SLP(C) No. 27182/2019 (IV-B) HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B. V. NAGARATHNA And HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH For the Petitioner : Mr. Nikhil Goel , Sr. Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain , AOR For the Respondent : Mr. Manish Khurana , Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Joshi , AOR ORDER UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following. Being agg ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to have considered the appeals on merits in their proper perspective. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent supported the impugned order and indicated that when the high Court was not convinced with any sufficient cause for condoning the delay it has dismissed the appeals on the ground of delay and also on considering the appeals on merits had dismissed it on merits also. Therefore thes ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 18.09.2018 530 days 67.7 27182 of 2019 03.03.2017 18.09.2018 530 days The High Court has not been convinced by the reasons stated for seeking condonation of delay and hence has dismissed the appeals on that ground. However, we find that the High Court has also considered the case of the appellants on merits and has simply extracted the findings of the Tribunal and has observed that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
