9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (3) TMI 779X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... etitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 17.01.2024 passed by respondent no.3 on the ground that he has not been afforded an opportunity of hearing as per Section 107(8) under the Central Goods and Services Tax, 2017 and the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax, 2017. The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 11.08.2023 passed under Section 74 of the GST Act raising a demand on the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iolation of the principles of natural justice by not affording any opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner challenged the same before the appellate authority under Section 107 of the GST Act. The appellate authority vide order dated 17.01.2024 dismissed the appeal of the petitioner on the ground of limitation. The petitioner relied upon the judgment passed by the Hon'ble ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ainst such person. Thus, where an adverse decision is contemplated against a person, such a person even need not to request for opportunity of personal hearing and it is mandatory for the authority concerned to afford opportunity of personal hearing before passing an order adverse of such person, as has been held in MAT No. 205 of 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner further relies upon anoth ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the Act of 1963 stands attracted. The prescribed period of 30 days from the date of communication of the adjudication order and the discretionary period of 30 days thereafter, aggregating to 60 days is not final and that, in given facts and circumstances of a case, the period for filing the appeal can be extended by the Appellate Authority". Applying the principle of the above mentioned auth ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
