9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (10) TMI 1076X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lly with the consent of the counsel for the parties. 2. Instant petition has been filed challenging an order dated 11/10/2013 (Annexure-P/1), passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench, Jabalpur in O.A.No.1133/11. The petitioners were engaged on temporary basis. They sought a relief to the effect that a direction be issued to the respondents to formulate a policy in regard to r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ade against sanctioned vacant posts. The tribunal observed that the petitioners failed to produce all the requisite informations/ details to satisfy their claim for regularization in service. Hence, in view of the pronouncement of the law laid down by the Constitution Bench of Hon. Apex Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karanataka & others Vs. Uma Devi & others (2006) 4 SCC 1, it was held t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rect Taxes (CPDT) vide letter dated 04.7.2011 has informed all the cadre controlling authority to outsource the services like data entry/typing/cleaning/security on contract basis without employing the individual contingent workers for these purposes. The letter dated 04.07.2011 reiterates the direction of the Department of Personal & Training (DOPT) New Delhi Instruction Dated 7.6.1998. It even h ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rom service. In the absence of any specific order of removal of the applicants as casual worker and in view of the specific stand of the respondents in their reply that no action for removal of the applicants is being taken/ contemplated at present and payments are being made to them in individual capacity as per the Government's guidelines regarding payment of wages to the casual workers, the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er and merit in the present petition. The petition is accordingly dismissed. In the result, the interim order dated 27.12.2012 passed in favour of petitioners stands vacated." 4. Looking to the aforesaid facts with further fact that since the petitioners failed to establish any legal right to the effect that their appointment was in accordance with law, the learned tribunal has rightly rejected ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
