9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (8) TMI 1596X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . Kadam and Company for the plaintiff. Mr. P. D. Jain for defendant No.1. ORDER P.C.: 1. In view of order passed by this Court on 11th July, 2016, the issues have been re-cast as under: 1. Whether the plaintiff proves that this Court has jurisdiction to receive, try and dispose of this suit? 2. Whether defendant No. 2 proves that the plaintiff has no cause of action against defendant No. 2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the plaintiff proves that they had raised invoices upon defendant No.1 as alleged in the plaint? 8. Whether the plaintiff proves that the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the plaintiff the sum of Rs.3,12,81,383/- together with further interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the principal amount of Rs.2,50,00,000/-? 9. What decree? What order? 2. The counsel for the plai ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
