2024 (6) TMI 1312

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Kiran, Government Advocate (Taxes) ORDER An order dated 30.04.2024 is assailed on the ground that the order is unreasoned and disregards the petitioner's replies. 2. The petitioner was a dealer under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. Upon receipt of a show cause notice dated 27.12.2023, the petitioner filed replies on 13.03.2024, 03.04.2024 and 29.04.2024. The impugned order was is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on record three replies to the show cause notice. In these replies, the petitioner has explained the reasons for mismatch by stating that Government Departments reflect transactions in GSTR 7 while deducting TDS and making payments. On examining the impugned order, it merely records that the reply is not accepted. Since the impugned order is completely unreasoned, it cannot be sustained. 6. For .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X