2024 (8) TMI 940

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... TICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth Bapna, Advocate Mr. Mehul Mittal Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Taneja, Additional Advocate General & Mr. Naresh Gupta, Advocate ORDER PER 1. Heard. 2. Despite existence of an alternative remedy available to the petitioner, the petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to invoke extraordinary jurisdiction of this .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... entertained despite existence of an alternative remedy. Leaned counsel would further submit that this issue has also been dealt with by the Calcutta High Court and orders have been passed, which case has also been referred to by this Court in M/s Apar Fragrances versus Union of India (Supra) and petition has been entertained. 3. Per-contra, learned counsel for the respondents would submit that bo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... regard to the alleged supplier firm being a fake/bogus firm not in existence, suffice it to say that this petition raises a factual dispute and has nothing to do with any jurisdictional issue, much less violation of principles of natural justice. Therefore, this case is distinguishable from the cases, which have been cited at the bar to seek intelligence of this Court. 6. Accordingly, this petiti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X