TMI Blog2017 (8) TMI 1731X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent And Hon'ble Mr. V. Padmanabhan, Member (Technical) For the Appellant : Sh. Vijay Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent Sh. Ranjan Khanna, AR. ORDER PER: JUSTICE (DR.) SATISH CHANDRA: The present appeal is filed against the order-in-appeal No. 347, 344, 346, 345/2010 & 66/2011 dated 21.09.2010 & dt. 17/22/.02.2011 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals-I) Central Excise, Jaipur. 2. The brief ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Ltd. - 2008 (12) STR 603 (Tri. Chennai) as well as Larsen & Toubro - 2015 (39) STR 913 (SC) was discussed. Finally the Tribunal observed that- "6. In view of the above discussion and analysis, we find that the impugned order as it stands with reference to tax liability of the appellant for construction of residential complex, is not sustainable. Accordingly, that portion of the finding is set as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|