TMI Blog2018 (5) TMI 2182X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for the Respondent. ORDER Per Bench Brief facts are that the appellants are manufacturers of Deisel engines falling under Chapter 84 of CETA, 1985. They engaged job workers for carrying out various operations on the raw materials in the process of manufacture of final products. During such processing, scrap arises in the job workers premises. The department was of the view that the job worker ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion Ltd. - 2008 (223) ELT 347 (Bom.). 3. The Ld. AR, Shri R. Subramaniyam, AC, supported the findings in the impugned order. 4. Heard both sides. 5. The issue stands covered in favour of the appellants by the decisions in the appellant's own case vide Final orders cited supra. Following the same, we are of the view that the demand cannot sustain. The impugned orders are set aside and the a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|