9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (1) TMI 1961X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner claims that being from the Mudaliar community, he had special connections with the people of his community, owning properties in Bangalore, and therefore, he had used this special circumstance to identify landlords and had procured prime properties on lease for the benefit of the present respondent and had entered into an a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r Sections 434 and 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 and since there was no compliance with the demand, the present petition is filed. It is also claimed that the respondent had paid certain amounts after the notice had been served. However, further demand in respect of the balance amount having not been complied with, the present petition is filed. 3. The respondent has entered appearance throu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... be dismissed. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner by way of reply, would seek to contend that the respondent does not have any reputation worth the name and it is a shadow company. The document produced by the respondent - Company is a bogus document. The original agreement is available with the petitioner and that he would seek to produce the same to demonstrate that the respondent has wil ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
