1971 (8) TMI 94

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... h of a certificate granted by the High Court of Allahabad under article 133(1)(a). Dr. L. M. Singhvi, learned counsel for the State, has raised a preliminary objection as to the maintainability of the appeal on the ground that the High Court was not competent to grant a certificate under article 133(1)(a). It may be noted that the appellant's prayer was that he may be granted a certificate both un .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ies. The question before the High Court related to the interpretation of section 6(2b) of the U. P. Agricultural Income-tax Act. The controversy between the parties was whether the appellant had an option to change the method of assessment. This issue was tried as a preliminary issue. The assessing authority came to the conclusion that he could not change the method of assessment. That decision .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X