Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2025 (1) TMI 594

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Smt. Pushpa Yadav, was diagnosed with cancer and her husband and son, being the other partners of the firm, were got involved in her treatment and therefore, the business was neglected, which resulted in non-filing of GSTR - 3B & GSTR - 1 within the time limit as prescribed under the GST Act. Thereafter, on 12.04.2023, a notice was issued by the respondent no. 3 for cancellation of the registration on the ground that the petitioner has failed to continuously furnish returns for a period of six months. The notice was issued through e-mail and as the other partners were involved in the treatment of Smt. Pushpa Yadav, they could not check e-mail. Thereafter, The respondent no. 3, vide impugned order dated 26.05.2023, cancelled the registration .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dice to the right and interest of the petitioner. Therefore, passing an order in gross violation of the principles of natural justice is clearly unsustainable in the eyes of law. 6. In support of her submissions, she has relied upon the judgements of this Court in Precitech Enginees Vs. State of U.P. & Others [MANU/UP/1870/2023] and M/s Assaka Powerinfra Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. & 2 Others [Writ Tax No. 1317/2024, decided on 02.09.2024]. She further submits that once the tax, along with interest as well as returns have been filed, the registration of the petitioner is liable to be restored. In support of her submission, she has relied upon the judgement of this Court in M/s Ennkay Timbers & Another Vs. State of U.P. & Others [2024 UPTC .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... peal against the said order which too was dismissed on the ground that the same was filed beyond the prescribed period of limitation. 3. In the light of the said submission, he argues that non-speaking order is neither contemplated under the Act nor does it conform with the Article 14 of the Constitution of India. He argues that in the notice does not specify the time and the date which is arbitrary exercise of power. In support of this, he places reliance upon the judgment of this Court in the case of M/s Jaiprakash Thekedar vs Commissioner, Commercial Taxes and another; [(2023 U.P.T.C. (VOL.113) - 162]. He also relies upon the judgment of this Court in the case of M/s Chandra Sain, Sharda Nagar, Lucknow through its Proprietor Mr. Chandr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dice to the rights and interest of the petitioner and as such the order, therefore, passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice, is clearly unsustainable. It is submitted that the order itself discloses that no opportunity of hearing was ever provided to the petitioner and the order has been passed in a cursory and mechanical manner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon a judgment and order dated 4th March, 2023 passed by this Court in Writ Tax No. 1583 of 2022; M/s Precitech Engineers vs. State of U.P. & others, wherein in the relevant paragraphs considering the legal position qua prerequisites for passing a final order having impact of adverse consequences and the requirement of the notice and giving .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 61]. Considering the fact that the order impugned cancelling the registration is prima facie without application of mind which is squarely covered by the judgment of this court in the case of M/s Chandra Sain (Supra) and the issue of non-fixation of time and date is squarely covered by the judgment rendered in the case of M/s Jaiprakash Thekedar (Supra), the writ petition deserves to be allowed on both the counts. " 4. Learned Standing Counsel could not dispute the aforesaid legal position laid down in order of this Court and also could not demonstrate from the impugned orders as to whether any date, time and place was assigned to hold hearing in the matter. Thus, he does not dispute this fact that final orders were passed in gross viol .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates