Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2025 (1) TMI 814

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 19. 2. The Assessee has taken the following grounds of appeal:- "1. Learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts of the case in passing the impugned order ex-parte and without deciding the Appeal on merits. 2. Learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on the facts of the case in confirming the action of learned AO in levying penalty u/s 270A of the Act amounting to Rs. 36,31,592/-. 3. In any case, the quantification of the penalty is erroneous and excessive. 4. In any case, the penalty order is barred by limitation and therefore not sustainable. 5. Learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in not properly appreciating and considering various evidence and supporting documents available on record during the course of the assessment pr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d (power plant unit) and the other unit on which no deduction was claimed (steel unit). Considering the turnover of the assessee, the Assessing Officer was of the view that 10% of the "other expenses" was attributable to unit on which deduction under Section 80-IA of the Act was being claimed by the assessee. Since a sum of Rs. 20.98 crores had been shown as "other expenses" where 10% of these other expenses i.e. Rs. 2.09 crores were considered to be expenses made under Section 80-IA of the Act, this amount of Rs. 2.09 crores was held to be attributable to such exempt unit and the same was disallowed and added to the total income of the assessee. The Assessing Officer also initiated proceedings under Section 270A of the Act. While passing t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s. 1.6 crores was not allocable to the 80-IA unit, since they were exclusively for manufacturing activity. Regarding, the allocation of 10% of "administrative and other expenses" to the 80-IA unit, Ld. CIT(A) held that the same should be allocated in proportion of the turnover of the eligible and non-eligible unit i.e. the expenses are required to be allocated in the ratio of turnover of power plant and the steel unit and directed the Ld. Assessing Officer to allow the claim of the assessee accordingly. In the appeal filed by the Department, the ITAT vide order dated 15.06.2022 dismissed the appeal of the assessee and upheld the order passed by Ld. CIT(A). However, while dismissing the appeal of the assessee with regards to penalty under Se .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d not passed order as per mandate of provisions of Section 250(6), one more opportunity should be granted to assessee to plead it's case before Commissioner (Appeals). Accordingly, in the interest of justice, the matter is restored to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for de-novo consideration and to pass appropriate orders, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the assessee and taking into consideration the orders passed by Ld. CIT(A) and ITAT for the impugned assessment year under consideration in quantum proceedings. 8. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Now we shall come to Assessee's Appeal in ITA No. 285/Ahd/2024 (A.Y. 2018-19) 9. The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: "1. L .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 10. The brief facts of the case are that during the course of assessment, the Assessing Officer made addition of Rs. 31.46 lakhs on account of short income booking with respect to duty draw back received, but not offered for taxation by the assessee. Further, the Assessing Officer also made an addition of Rs. 2.70 crores by reducing the deduction allowable under Section 80-IA of the Act on account of apportioning of certain expenses from the ineligible unit (Sponge Iron Plant) to the eligible unit (solar power plant) by holding that the assessee had allocated excessive expenses to the ineligible unit. 11. In appeal, Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee on account of non-appearance. 12. Before us, the Counsel for the assessee .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates