9911796707
TMI Blog2025 (2) TMI 597X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... HC X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nd Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Advs. in Items No. 13-15, 18, 31, 34, 35, 37-54. Mr. R. Venkat Prabhat, SPC with Mr. Abhinav M. Goel, Ms Kamna Behrani and Mr. Ansh Kalra, Advs. for UOI in Item No. 54. (M: 9109698880). PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The Respondents in these petitions who are stated to be the domestic industry, had filed their respective applications before the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (hereinafter "DGTR") praying for imposition of Anti-Dumping Duty (hereinafter "ADD") in terms of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (hereinafter "the Act") and Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rul ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... luorochemicals Limited Polytetra-fluoroethylene (PTEE) Russia 13. W.P (C) 3824/2023 Union of India vs Deepak Phenolics Ltd Phenol European Union, Singapore 14. W.P (C) 3825/2023 Union of India vs Jindal Stainless Hisar Limited Flat Products of Stainless Steel Indonesia 15. W.P (C) 4039/2023 Union of India vs Jindal Stainless Limited JSL Hot Rolled Flat Products of Stainless Steel - 304 grade China PR, Malaysia and Korea RP 16. W.P (C) 4401/2023 Union of India vs Jindal Stainless Hisar Limited JSHL Hot Rolled Flat Products of Stainless Steel - 304 grade China PR, Malaysia and Korea RP 17. W.P (C) 4501/2023 Union of India vs Jindal Stainless Limited JSL Flat Products of Stainless Steel Indonesia 18. W.P (C) 4506/2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . W.P(C)6385/ 2023 SIJ Acroni DOO vs Jindal Stainless Hisar Limited & Ors. Flat Rolled Products of Stainless Steel China PR, Kora PR, European Union, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, United States of America, Japan, Indonesia, UAE, Hong Kong, Singapore, Mexico, Vietnam, Malaysia 3. Findings were issued in the respective applications by the Designated Authority, DGTR recommending imposition of provisional ADD on the concerned import of goods from certain countries. Thereafter, final findings were also notified recommending imposition of ADD. The definitive ADD was then imposed vide respective Customs notifications issued in various cases. 4. After the imposition of the ADD, a sunset review was undertaken by the Designated Authority ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed counsel for the petitioner that the domestic industries have given up their right in terms of the recommendation made by the designated authority, as well as, their claims on the basis of the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi. In view of the statement made, the special leave petition is dismissed as infructuous." 10. In terms of the submissions made before the Supreme Court, ld. Counsel for the domestic industries who are the Respondents in these cases, submit that they have already written to the Government that they do not press their rights in terms of the recommendation given by the Designated Authority, DGTR. 11. In effect thereof, the domestic industry no longer p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
