The ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal, directing the exclusion ...

Taxpayer Wins Transfer Pricing Appeal: Functional Dissimilarity and Related Party Transactions Lead to Margin Alignment

May 21, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal, directing the exclusion of multiple comparables from transfer pricing analysis due to functional dissimilarity, related party transactions exceeding 25%, and lack of segmental revenue information. Upon exclusion of these entities, the remaining comparables' operating profit margins aligned with the assessee's declared margins, demonstrating arm's length pricing. The Tribunal instructed the Assessing Officer to recompute the Arm's Length Price by excluding specified companies, thereby deleting transfer pricing adjustments under Section 92CA(3) that were previously confirmed by the CIT(A).

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal, directing the exclusion ...

Taxpayer Wins Transfer Pricing Appeal: Functional Dissimilarity and Related Party Transactions Lead to Margin Alignment

May 21, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

CIRP - discrimination of Related Party Financial or Operational Creditor - IBC treats related parties as a separate category for specified purposes, excluding from the...

CIRP proceedings - Financial Creditors - Related party - while the default rule under the first proviso to Section 21(2) is that only those financial creditors that are...

The Appellant, a related party unsecured financial creditor, challenged the resolution plan approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the Adjudicating Authority,...

Validity of deed of assignment - Related Party - if the Assignor of a debt is a Related Party of the Corporate Debtor, as per the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble NCLAT,...

Inclusion of name of applicant in the CoC - related party or not - the Applicant is stepping into the shoes of the Assignor and thereby takes over the right of the...

Valuation of imported goods - Related person - Merely because there were transfer of funds in India amongst three importers will not make them related persons in terms...

Resolution Professional's decision to remove appellant from Committee of Creditors upheld by NCLAT. The appellant, Hari Vitthal Mission, was determined to be a related...

The Supreme Court held that the lookback period for related party transactions u/s 43 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) is two years before the insolvency...

Addition of interest on interest free loans advanced by assessee Company to sister concerns/related parties disallowed. Onus on assessee to prove commercial expediency...

A recent circular addressed the taxability of loans between related parties or affiliates. The circular clarifies that providing loans between related parties...

Penalty u/s 271AA - failure to make disclosures, as required u/s 92E - as to whether SPMCECL was a related party is an issue qua which there can possibly be more than...

E-auction of assets corporate debtors - who can participate - Scope of the term related party / relative - The expressions ‘related party’ and ‘relative’ contained in...

CIRP - Relating parties - As on the date of it becoming a part of the CoC, Respondent No. 2 was purely a Financial Creditor of the Corporate Debtor and hence, it cannot...

Disallowance towards Client Maintenance Charges - ‘related party’ - ICICI Bank Ltd. does not fall in the definition of ‘related party’ in terms of Section 40A(2)(b) of...

Valuation (Central Excise) - Sale to related parties - the price to the related person cannot be called a non-commercial price since the same was higher than the price...

Quick Updates: