Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

Methodology For Determining API

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dology given in the Table below by combining the data of all quarters available in respect of each parameter. S. No. in the API format (Annexure-IV) API Parameter Methodology 2 Ratio of number of taxpayers audited to number of taxpayers scheduled for audit (Marks in percentile on a scale of 0-10) The ratio (shown in percentage) of number of taxpayers audited in a quarter to the number of taxpayers scheduled for audit in that quarter is calculated. Comparative performance of all the Audit Commissionerates will be determined on percentile system for score from 0-10. For example, if one of the Audit Commissionerates attained the highest percentage, say 95%, during a quarter, that Audit Commissionerate will be awarded the highest perce .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... termined on percentile system score from 0-4. For example, if the above parameter ranges between 153 lakhs and 45 lakhs for all the Audit Commissionerates, the Audit Commissionerate with detection per audit of 153 lakhs is awarded highest percentile of 100 with a score of 4 and the Audit Commissionerate with detection per audit of 45 lakhs is awarded score of 1.18 (i.e., 4*45/153). Scores of all other Audit Commissionerates will be awarded in between 4 and 1.18. 4B 80% weightage to remaining taxpayers (i.e.,0-16) Detection per audit for the remaining taxpayers is calculated for a quarter. Comparative performance of all the Audit Commissionerates will be determined on percentile system score from 0-16. For example, if the above parame .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , the Audit Commissionerate with recovery per audit of 30 lakhs is awarded highest percentile of 100 and score of 16 and the Audit Commissionerate with recovery per audit of 2.5 lakhs is awarded score of 1.33 (i.e., 16*2.5/30). Scores of all other Audit Commissionerates will be awarded in between 16 and 1.33. 6 Ratio of total recovery to total detection (Marks in percentile on a scale of 0-10) The ratio (shown in percentage) of total recovery in a quarter to the total detections in that quarter is calculated. Comparative performance of all the Audit Commissionerates will be determined on percentile system for score from 0-10. For example, if the highest percentage during a quarter, say 65%, is attained by one of the Audit Commissioner .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r finding the ratio, the comparative performance of all the Audit Commissionerates will be determined on percentile system for score from 0-10. For example, if one of the Audit Commissionerates attained the highest percentage, say 60%, that Audit Commissionerate will be awarded highest percentile of 100 and score of 10 and if another Audit Commissionerate attained the lowest percentage, say 35%, during that quarter, it will be awarded score of 5.83 (i.e., 35*10/60). Scores of remaining all other Audit Commissionerates will be awarded accordingly in between 10 and 5.83. 9 Final Marks Final marks/score will be the aggregate of scores obtained by each Audit Commissionerate against Col. Nos 2 to 8 of Annexure-IV. 10 Rank The Audit Commi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates