9911796707
TMI Blog2025 (4) TMI 732X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dents: By Advs. Premjit Nagendran, M.R. Anandakuttan, M. Hemalatha, Mahesh Anandakuttan, Dona Augustine, By Smt. Jasmin M.M., Government Pleader., Girish Kumar V, Krishna K, Advocate General Office Kerala, V.V. Surendran, Achyuth Menon (K/584/2017), Nirmal Krishnan (K/1111/2021), Parvathi S, T.K. Sreekala (K/000246/1987), Nikitha Susan, Paulson (K/001533/2019), Uthara Asokan (K/001361/2020), Anand Geo (K/2561/2023), K.I. Mayankutty Mather (Sr.) (K/272/1984), P.A. Harish, Dona Paul, Shilpa K. COMMON JUDGMENT In W.P.(C) No.1855 of 2025, petitioner has sought for a direction to dispose of Ext.P8 application expeditiously, while the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.6509 of 2025 has sought for a direction to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 therei ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... egistration. According to him, there are various disputes between the siblings regarding the entitlement of Sri. Raveendran to continue the business and a civil suit as O.S.No.172/2022 is also pending between the parties. Sri. Suveendran alleges that some of the documents produced by Sri. Raveendran to justify his claim for entitlement to continue the business, are forged. 4. in the meantime, Sri. Suveendran filed W.P.(C) No.6509 of 2025 to dispose of a representation dated 10.02.2025 filed by him before the first respondent in that writ petition. In the said representation, he has pointed out various anomalies, which according to him requires the attention of the first respondent and the unauthorised activities allegedly being carried out ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... an impleading petition. 7. As far as W.P.(C) No. 1855 of 2025 is concerned, the relief sought for, is only to dispose of a statutory application. Since such an application for revocation of cancellation of registration has to be disposed of in a time bound manner, the said relief has to be allowed. As the additional 2nd respondent is apparently an interested party, his contentions should also be considered. Therefore, Ext.P8 in W.P.(C) No. 1855 of 2025 can be directed to be considered in a time bound manner, after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as to additional respondents 2 and 3 as well as another legal heir by name Mahendran. The said decision shall be taken, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, withi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... regarding the application for revocation of cancellation, it is only appropriate that the goods in the godown are not permitted to be removed. Therefore, the life of the order dated 20.03.2025 which is confined to the erstwhile MRT Metal Mart godown, must continue till a decision is taken by the first respondent as directed in W.P.(C) No.1855 of 2025. 11. The learned Senior Counsel pointed out that on the basis of the interim order, various godowns including those unrelated to MRT Metal Mart have been sealed. I make it clear that the order dated 20.03.2025 is confined to the godown of the erstwhile MRT Metal Mart alone and not anything else. The said order shall continue till the Commissioner takes a decision. If any godown other than MRT ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
