Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1991 (2) TMI 134

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ate of exemption dated 29-7-1964 was granted by the Central Excise Collector, Kanpur to the petitioner. It exempted the petitioner "from payment of duty on the 125 M.T. of Straw Board or Pulp Board including Grey Board in a financial year." The petitioner says that he was availing of the said exemption and not paying any duty. While so, he was served with a notice of demand in Form D.D. 2 dated 26-7-1969/19-8-1969 calling upon him to pay a sum of Rs. 1,25,765/- towards the duty on Pulp Board manufactured by him. The petitioner says that he made a representation against the said demand but to no avail before the Collector, Central Excise (Appeals). The appellate authority allowed the appeal by its order dated 20-12-1976 on the ground that th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... his case and, therefore, the demand raised against him is confirmed. 4. In the counter-affidavit filed by the respondents, it is stated that the petitioner was not really entitled to exemption and that he obtained the exemption by misrepresentation of facts and by playing fraud upon the authorities. Inasmuch as the exemption was obtained fraudulently, it is submitted, the said exemption was withdrawn. It is also submitted that a criminal complaint was also laid against the petitioner under Section 420 I.P.C. It is submitted that demand for duty was validly raised and that even after the earlier order the petitioner did not produce any material to substantiate his case, for which reason the demand was confirmed. 5. In the rejoinder affidav .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 80 is liable to be quashed and is quashed herewith. The Assistant Collector shall hear the petitioner afresh and determine whether any duty is due from him and if so on what account and for what period. If the authorities find that there is an order of withdrawal of exemption and if such order is found to have been passed without notice to the petitioner, the same shall be treated as ineffective. In such a case the petitioner shall be called upon to explain why the exemption granted to him should not be withdrawn for the reasons to be specified in such notice. At such hearing and/or in pursuance of such notice, as the case may be it shall be open to the petitioner to raise such objections as are open to him in law. The authorities shall con .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates