Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2025 (5) TMI 1438

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er-in-original dated 02nd February, 2025 (hereinafter, 'the impugned order') by which demands and penalties have been raised against the Petitioner entity-M/s Banson Enterprises. 4. The impugned order arises out of show cause notice dated 03rd August, 2024 (hereinafter, 'the SCN'). 5. The allegations raised by the Department against the Petitioner entity in the said SCN is that a search was conducted at the premises of the Petitioner entity and it was revealed that the Petitioner entity had issued goods-less invoices to various entities in order to enable fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit (hereinafter, 'ITC'). The ITC which was availed by the Petitioner entity was to the tune of Rs. 1,85,73,718/- and it is this amount which was set .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... itled The Assistant Commissioner of State Tax and Others vs. M/s Commercial Steel Limited as also upon the decision of the Allahabad High Court in Writ Tax No. 753 of 2023 titled Elesh Aggarwal vs. Union of India. 9. It is further submitted by counsel for the Respondent that the statement of Mr. Bansal-Petitioner No. 2, being one of the Directors of the Petitioner entity has been recorded where he admits that he supplied goods-less invoices of taxable value 45,04,500/- to one M/s Saraswati Printers during Central Excise period i.e. from 30th June, 2016 to 21st March, 2017. Under such circumstances, it is submitted that the Petitioner ought to be relegated to the Appellate Tribunal. 10. The Court has considered the matter. As held in M/s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e impugned order of the High Court. The writ petition filed by the respondent shall stand dismissed. However, this shall not preclude the respondent from taking recourse to appropriate remedies which are available in terms of Section 107 of the CGST Act to pursue the grievance in regard to the action which has been adopted by the state in the present case. 11. The above legal position has also been reiterated in Elesh Aggarwal (supra) wherein the Allahabad High Court has held that no ground is made for interference on merits in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction. 12. The nature of the allegation against the Petitioner in the present case, as is clear from the SCN as also the impugned order is that the Petitioner, in collusion with o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ugned order are extremely serious in nature. They reveal the complex maze of transactions, which are alleged to have been carried out between various nonexistent firms for the sake of enabling fraudulent availment of the ITC. 12. The entire concept of Input Tax Credit, as recognized under Section 16 of the CGST Act is for enabling businesses to get input tax on the goods and services which are manufactured/supplied by them in the chain of business transactions. The same is meant as an incentive for businesses who need not pay taxes on the inputs, which have already been taxed at the source itself. The said facility, which was introduced under Section 16 of the CGST Act is a major feature of the GST regime, which is business friendly and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... port the unscrupulous litigants. 17. Moreover, when such transactions are entered into, a factual analysis would be required to be undertaken and the same cannot be decided in writ jurisdiction. The Court, in exercise of its writ jurisdiction, cannot adjudicate upon or ascertain the factual aspects pertaining to what was the role played by the Petitioner, whether the penalty imposed is justified or not, whether the same requires to be reduced proportionately in terms of the invoices raised by the Petitioner under his firm or whether penalty is liable to be imposed under Section 122 (1) and Section 122 (3) of the CGST Act. 18. The persons, who are involved in such transactions, cannot be allowed to try different remedies before differe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates