9911796707
TMI Blog2000 (1) TMI 63X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... writ appeals are filed assailing the order dismissing the writ petition. 2.The brief facts of the case are Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 (for short 'the Scheme') was introduced with effect from 1-9-1998 by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 ('Act' for short) for settling tax arrears, locked in litigation at a substantial discount. Section 88 enables any person to make a declaration to the designate ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... have filed writ petitions challenging the orders dated 21-9-1995 and 24-10-1996. In the first batch of cases the Court issued notice regarding Rule, on 17-12-1998. When the matter came up for preliminary hearing, the Court made the following order :- "In view of the urgency to avail the benefit under the scheme "KAR VIVAD SAMADHAN SCHEME 98" issue rule. The maintainability of the writ petition i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... vad Samadhan Scheme 98' issue rule. The maintainability of the writ petition is kept open". This order clearly shows that the writ petition is not admitted and the notice issued is also subject to maintainability. Therefore on that date the writ petition was not admitted and pending and thus the scheme will not apply as per Section 95 of the Act. It is also relevant to extract Rule 13 of the Writ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nder proviso to Rule 13(a), so the writ petition is not pending on that day. Accordingly, we entirely agree with the learned single Judge. In the writ petition the impugned orders are passed in the year 1995 and whereas the writ petition is filed in 1998 after delay of three years. This Court in Gopal Films v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Others (ILR 1999 KAR 1857), has held that : "Th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
