2002 (2) TMI 113

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Judge for Economic Offences, Hyderabad, the complainant - Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise (Legal), Head Quarter Office, Hyderabad, preferred Criminal Appeal No. 428 of 1999 before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad for enhancement of sentence imposed against the respondents. That appeal was dismissed by the High Court by holding that - (1) appeal for enhancement of sentence und .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n by the High Court is totally erroneous. The High Court arrived at the conclusion that the appeal filed by the Special Public Prosecutor was not maintainable because it was required to be filed through the Public Prosecutor as contemplated under Section 377(2) Cr.P.C. 6.This submission of the learned Addl. Solicitor General requires to be accepted. Section 24(8) Cr.P.C. specifically empowers th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X