2002 (2) TMI 120

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... is the A.P. Paper Mills Limited, Rajahmundry, represented by its Deputy Manager (Excise), who assails the order dated 10-12-2001 made by the 1st respondent in Stay Petition No. 67/2001 (V)-C.E., on various grounds. 2.We have heard Sri V. Srinivas, Counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.V. Ramulu, Standing Counsel for the respondents. 3.It is submitted by the Counsel for the petitioner that as agai .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rected the 1st respondent herein to pass appropriate orders on the basis of the 1st submissions made by the petitioner. Thus the Appellate Authority passed a detailed order on 10-12-2001 in the Stay Petition No. 67/2001 (V)-C.E. 5.The Counsel for the petitioner further submitted that even on remand of the matter, the Appellate Authority has not applied his mind, inasmuch as, in a routine manner a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s required by this Court and accordingly, we dismiss the writ petition. However, we grant one month time to the petitioner to deposit the amount of Rs. 2 crores as directed by the 1st respondent in the order impugned and the Appellate Authority shall proceed to dispose of the appeal within a period of one month thereafter by giving necessary opportunity to the petitioner. No costs.
Case laws, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X