2008 (1) TMI 405

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ved this Court seeking a mandamus against the Respondents more specifically Respondent No. 3 to comply with the direction of the CESTAT which has allowed the Appeal filed by the petitioners herein [2007 (220) E.L.T. 783 (Tri. - Mumbai)]. By a separate order passed today in Customs Appeal Lodging No. 115 of 2007 we have dismissed the said Appeal. 2. In our opinion the reliefs as prayed really cann .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as understood by the respondents considering Regulation 15(2) . 3. While disposing of the Customs Appeal Lodging No. 115 of 2007 we have held that the proviso merely confers a discretion on the authorities therein, even if a qualified person is not available to permit the business house to carry on business if there is a person holding "G" card. The proviso does not lead to the conclusion that on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... red by them before the Tribunal was allowed. The Appeal preferred by the Revenue before this Court has been dismissed. We asked the learned Counsel for the respondents if there be anything adverse against the petitioners herein. We are informed, on instructions, that there is nothing adverse against the petitioners. In these circumstances in our opinion the ends of justice would require that the r .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X