Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2000 (9) TMI 92

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ants had imported the aforesaid goods from the U.S.A. The goods were assessed under Heading No. 90.10 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act 1975 (hereinafter referred to as "the Tariff"). The importers paid duty accordingly but, later on, filed a refund application claiming classification of the imported item under Heading No. 84.35 of the Tariff and consequential exemption under Notification No. 112/77-Cus dated 1-7-1977. The Assistant Collector rejected the refund claim. The appeal filed by the party against the Assistant Collector's order was rejected by the Collector (Appeals). Both the authorities found the goods to be appropriately classifiable under Heading No. 90.10 of the Tariff. Hence the present appeal by the assessee. 3.Appellants have made a request for decision on the merits of the appeal without personal hearing. 4.We have carefully examined the records and have heard ld. DR, Shri Ashok for the respondent. We have also heard ld. Advocates, S/Shri A.R. Madhav Rao and Shekhar Vyas as intervenors. 5.Ld. DR reiterated the observations and findings of the lower appellate authority. He sought to rule out Heading No. 84.35 by submitting that the "Master Mak .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... After careful consideration of the rival submissions, we have found that the key to resolution of the classification dispute lies in the Apex Court's judgments cited by ld. Advocate, Shri Madhav Rao. In the case of Delhi Press Samachar Patrika (supra), the imported item considered for classification was "automatic plate processor". The importers had claimed classification under Heading 84.34 of the Tariff whereas the assessing authority classified the item under Heading 90.10. The Collector (Appeals) sustained the assessee's claim. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the lower appellate authority. The Collector of Customs challenged the Tribunal's decision before the Supreme Court in appeal. The Apex Court dismissed the appeal of the Revenue. The ratio of the Apex Court's decision can be discerned from the following para :- The Tribunal has distinguished its earlier decisions upholding the classification of Automatic Plate Processor under Heading 90.10 on the ground that where the plate processor unit is combined with exposure unit it has to be classified under Heading 90.10 since the principle of photography was involved in the exposure unit. The learned Counsel for the appella .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... evenue's appeals, observed as under :- The agreed report of the Team appointed by the Tribunal indicates clearly that these plates are meant for and are used for printing purposes. Whether we look at the end use or to the character and nature of the goods, they are in the main plates employed in the printing of newspaper/magazines. The Tribunal has opined; on the basis of the above material that Toyobo photo sensitive nylon printing plates are exclusively used in printing industry and are called Photographic Plates within the meaning of Chapter 37. They placed them under chapter heading 84.34. We are unable to say that the conclusion arrived at by the Tribunal is not correct. It may not also be entirely correct to say that in no case can the end use or function of the goods is relevant on the question of classification. A three Judge Bench of this Court has relied upon the function and end use also in determining the classification in Indian Tool Manufacturers v. Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Nasik Ors. [1994 (74) E.L.T. 12 (S.C.) = 1994 (Supp) 3 S.C.C. 632]. 9.We note that, in Delhi Press Samachar Patrika (supra) the rival entries which arose in the classification c .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ive print. Reprography is a process of fascimile reproduction of graphic matter, involving its transmission by electro-static energy, especially wire or radio. Reprography has two aspects viz., Photocopy and thermocopy. Photocopying is a process of mere graphic reproduction by the action of light whereas thermocopying is a process of mere graphic representation by the action of light on an electrically charged photo-conductive insulating surface, in which a latent image is developed with a resinous powder. Appellants have submitted that, out of the two methods of preparing printing plates viz. (i) photo-type setting and composing and (ii) reprography, they adopted the latter. No principle of photography is involved in the latter method of reprography, unlike in the former. Appellants have further contended that the function and end-use of the machine should be the guiding factor for classification and that the item in question should be classified under Heading No.84.34 of the Tariff by virtue of its end-use in the printing industry. 12. We note that, though the appellants were claiming classification under Heading 84.35 before the lower authorities, they preferred to switch ov .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... The matter printed on the photo-sensitive paper (otherwise called 'photographic paper') was pasted on a newspaper form according to the required layout. The pasted layout was converted into a film negative which would be in the form of a newspaper page. The film negative matter was then transferred to a photo-sensitive plate by exposures to ultraviolet radiation. The plate, so exposed/non-sensitized, was then subjected to chemical processing in "Nylo wash-out" unit, which resulted in physical image coming in the form of relief on the plate. The plate with the relief character thereon was then ready for being taken onto the printing machine for printing of the newspaper. [The Tribunal, on the basis of the report, reached a finding in the case of Kasturi Sons that the printing plates used by them were intended for use exclusively in printing industry and held that the goods were classifiable under Heading 84.34. This decision was upheld by the Supreme Court in Kumudam Publications (supra)]. 15. The 'Mastermaker' was imported with accessories viz. plate-making material, conversion solution, toner, dispersant and quartz iodine lamps (vide invoice bill of entry). The diagram coup .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates