TMI Blog2000 (11) TMI 191X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... out of the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Allahabad who has confirmed a duty demand of Rs. 21,21,385/- upon the appellants herein who are manufacturers of PP medicines falling under CET Sub-heading 3003.10, by denying them the benefit of SSI Notification 175/86 dated 1-3-1986 as amended and Notification 1/93 dated 28-2-1993 as amended, holding that the appellants are owned and contro ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hers v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Madras reported in 1999 (31) RLT 104. 3. We see great force in the above submission. In the case of Ogesh Industries cited supra, it has been held that when a demand is raised by clubbing of the value of clearances of two units, and show cause notice has been issued only to one unit and not to the other, when the separate existence of both Units was projec ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan taken together exceeds the ceiling limit on value of clearances prescribed in the SSI exemption Notifications. Therefore, the ratio of the above cited decisions is applicable on all fours to the present case and following the same, we set aside the impugned order as bad in law on this preliminary point alone without going into the merits of the case. - - TaxTMI - T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
