2004 (5) TMI 137

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... are against duty demand of Rs. 3,52,08,527/- for the period July 1997 to June, 2000 and imposition of penalty of an equal amount on the first appellant and penalty of Rs. 1 Lakh on the second appellant. The Adjudicating Commissioner has confirmed the duty demand on the ground that the assessable value for captive consumption has not included the expenses incurred by the corporate office as well as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X