2004 (8) TMI 198

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . The issue involved in this appeal is clubbing of clearances of the following five units with those of M/s. Madhusudan Chemical Industries (proprietary concern). (i)         Muktanand Chemical Industries (ii)        Chandrajyot Chemical Industries (iii)       Goga Dye Chemical Industries ( .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... prior to imposition of duty on Organic Surface Active Agents on 1-8-1985. 5.The Central Board of Excise & Customs, New Delhi, issued a Circular No. 6/92, dated 29-5-1992, clarifying the following position. (i)         Different firms will be treated as different manufacturers for the purpose of the exemption limit. But if a firm consisting of certain part .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nbsp;    If there are more than one mill under the control of one manufacturer, there is no question of choosing any "mill" for the purpose of exemption. The Central Excise Department is concerned with a manufacturer which may be an individual, a firm, a limited company, etc. 6.Further, the Board has issued circulars to be followed under the Notification No. 175/86-C.E. and as per .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... consisting of certain partners say, A, B & C, has got more than one factory, all these factories should of course be combined. Limited companies whether public or private are separate entities distinct from the shareholders composing it. Hence each limited company is a manufacturer by itself and will be entitled to a separate exemption limit. (iii)       If there are .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X