NDPS - As there is no absolute rule that police officers cannot ...

Indian Laws

May 29, 2013

NDPS - As there is no absolute rule that police officers cannot be cited as witnesses and their depositions should be treated with suspect therefore, the prosecution case cannot be doubted for non-examining the independent witnesses. - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

NDPS - As there is no absolute rule that police officers cannot ...

Indian Laws

May 29, 2013

You may also like:

Proof of smuggling of goods - DW.1 (revenue officer) stated in evidence that it was suspected that articles were smuggled and that it was believed that the articles were...

Illegal detention of applicant for three consecutive days - investigation not conducted in accordance of law - No grounds are made out to allow the presence of the...

NDPS - Power to seize and arrest of a person in a public place - Smuggling - Ganja - Samples being taken at the CGST Bhawan - The High Court found that the officers...

Smuggling - offence under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS) - There is no law that the evidence of police officials,...

Dishonor of Cheque - seeking cross examination of the complainant officer of the bank - In the present application the recall, re-cross examination of the complainant is...

Clandestine removal - denial of opportunity of cross-examination of witnesses - The only question is at what stage would he be entitled to cross-examine the witnesses -...

Principles of natural justice - request for cross examination of panch-witnesses and of departmental officers has been rejected - the allegations of Show Cause Notice...

Commercial quantity under the NDPS Act - If the contraband seized falls within the provisions of NDPS Act, the weight of the neutral substance would not be ignored while...

Recovery of narcotics from a vehicle which was stopped during transit - Ganja - contraband item - procedure of search and seizure governed by Section 43 read with...

Revision u/s 263 - Every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, for example, when an...

Smuggling - contraband item kept in safe custody by income tax officers - The statements of the Income Tax Officers find requisite support in the statements of the...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - reopening of assessment u/s 147 - "reason to suspect" v/s 'reason to believe' - Information adverse may trigger "reason to suspect" and not...

Validity of conviction made - conviction based solely on the purported confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act - evidentiary value present or...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reasons to believe or suspect - huge share transaction - The court held that the reasons provided by the Assessing Officer for...

Levy of penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 on the owners of the seized goods - Allegation that, pulses (URAD ki Dal) in question were meant for illegal export from...

Quick Updates: