Revision u/s 264 - application for revision was rejected because ...

High Court Rejects Revision Application u/s 264 for Missing Rs. 500 Fee, Allows Rectification Opportunity.

June 12, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Revision u/s 264 - application for revision was rejected because it was not accompanied by the requisite fee of Rs.500/- An opportunity should be given to cure the same - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 264 - application for revision was rejected because ...

High Court Rejects Revision Application u/s 264 for Missing Rs. 500 Fee, Allows Rectification Opportunity.

June 12, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Revision application u/s 264 was initially rejected due to non-payment of mandatory fee of Rs. 500. However, the petitioner paid the fee immediately upon objection...

Revision application u/s 264 to get refund - application by amalgamated company - order of CIT rejecting the application is erroneous - refund allowed u/s 237 - Tri

Revision of other orders u/s 264 - petitioners sought to expressly withdraw the revision petition filed u/s 264 - application was pending for decision - Thus by not...

The GoI's DGFT issued Notification No. 04/2025-26 amending Import Policy Condition No. 07 (i) of Chapter-27 in ITC (HS), 2022. The amendment modifies the Coal Import...

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - Commissioner has rejected the revision petition u/s 264 on the ground of that the Petitioner did not comply with the mandatory...

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - CIT rejected the application - Petitioner has not filed the revised returns u/s 139(5) of the Act but he has admitted to an...

The HC held that even if an assessee commits an error, it can be examined u/s 264 of the Act, which has a wide scope. The revision authority cannot decline consideration...

Section 264 revision application concerning long-term capital gain (LTCG) on extinguishment of shares due to loss arising from NCLT order. Petitioner's claim for loss on...

HC allowed the writ petition challenging Commissioner's order under Section 264. Prior amendment of Return of Income was not mandatory before filing revision application....

Revision u/s 264 - seeking direction to re-consider the claim of the petitioner for deduction u/s 80-IA - there is no limitation on the power of the Pr. CCIT, CCIT, CIT...

Revision u/s 264 - computation of income from capital gains - Although, there is a detailed discussion with regard to the nature of the transaction, as to whether it is...

CBIC has clarified fee requirements for time extension applications under Rules 6 and 7 of Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017. The Board addressed...

The High Court held that the petitioner, a Director in the Government of Meghalaya's Department of Soil, who claimed exemption from income tax u/s 10(26) as a member of...

The petitioner incurred expenditure towards application of income as required u/s 11(1)(d) for the year under consideration, which was evident from the computation of...

Maintainability of wrt petition before HC where option for filing Revision u/s 264 is available - Rejection of Refund of excess amount paid as tax - There are no...

Quick Updates: