Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - quasi criminal proceedings - penalty ...

Penalties u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act: Imposed Only for Deliberate, Defiant, or Conscious Non-Compliance.

June 27, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - quasi criminal proceedings - penalty will not ordinarily be imposed unless the party obliged under the Act has either acted deliberately in defiance of law or was guilty of conduct contumacious or acted in conscious disregard of its obligation. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - quasi criminal proceedings - penalty ...

Penalties u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act: Imposed Only for Deliberate, Defiant, or Conscious Non-Compliance.

June 27, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleted the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) during reassessment proceedings....

Validity of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance - The assessee has shown sufficient cause for non-compliance, moreover, such non-compliance was done by...

Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - default of non-compliance of the statutory notice issued under section 142(1) r.w.s. 129 - where the assessment order was finally passed u/s...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) concerning the correct classification of income. The Assessing Officer treated the income as 'income...

The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of notice u/s 142(1) - The judgment/decision on the strength of which we had expressed deletion of penalty are not applicable, as...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(b) - assessee failed to give reasons for non-compliance of statutory notice u/s. 142(1) - till the disposal of appeal by the CIT(A) the assessee...

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee has made no response to the questionnaire - there was no wisdom in the assessment order in respect of alleged non-compliance - when the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income was declared in survey u/s 133A - date of filing of return u/s 139(1) had not expired - The fact of “concealment of income” and...

Quick Updates: