Revision u/s 263 - Section 145A is a non-obstante provision, ...

Income Tax

June 29, 2013

Revision u/s 263 - Section 145A is a non-obstante provision, which, therefore, is to be necessarily followed for the purpose of returning the income - revision upheld - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - Section 145A is a non-obstante provision, ...

Income Tax

June 29, 2013

You may also like:

IT - Concept of Mutuality - Provisions of Section 44A starts with non-obstante clause and therefore to be read independent to other provisions

Disallowance u/s 43B - Assessee has not claimed it as an expenditure in the P&L - No hesitation to hold that non- payment of above amount to government account before...

Revision u/s 263 - tds credit issue non examination by AO - non examination of an issue by the AO renders the assessment erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue

Disallowance of unpaid service tax u/s 43B - Service tax collected by the assessee and not paid to the Government exchequer before the due date of filing of return, is...

Revision u/s 263 - violation of the provisions of section 40A(3) - CIT is not justified in invoking jurisdiction u/s 263 on the strength of an audit note - AT

Power of revision under section 263 – Amendment to Explanation to Section 115 JB - subsequent amendment in 2005 even though retrospective will not attract the provision...

Revision u/s 263 - assessee had utilized the unsecured loans for non business purpose and interest paid on the same has been claimed as business expenses - matter...

Revision u/s 263 - if the transfer of asset is to be assessed under the head `income from business’ necessarily, the provisions of section 43CA would have application...

Dishonor of Cheque - settlement of disputes between the parties - compounding of offences u/s 138 - Needless to say, the operation or effect of a general Act can be...

Revision u/s 263 - assessment order passed u/s 153A r.w.s 143(3) - no any incriminating material unearthed by search team therefore Assessing Officer’s order is not erroneous.

Quick Updates: