Jurisdiction u/s 263 - Revision - there was an error in the ...

Income Tax

September 7, 2013

Jurisdiction u/s 263 - Revision - there was an error in the order of the assessing officer inasmuch as that the assessing officer has not recorded his reasons for reaching a conclusion - that a speaking order must speak for itself and a reference to show cause notice is uncalled for - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Jurisdiction u/s 263 - Revision - there was an error in the ...

Income Tax

September 7, 2013

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - addition u/s 68 - The Assessing Officer has taken a possible view. When the Assessing Officer follows the direction of the Ld. Pr. CIT, in his order...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Unexplained bank deposits - PCIT, without making further inquiry on his own account, has simply stated in the impugned order that the Assessing...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - receipt of share premium - the power of revision u/s 263 does not allow for supplanting or substituting the view of the Assessing Officer. The...

Revision u/s 263 - assessment order as contrary to the draft assessment order - The remedy against unjust disallowances, on merits, lies in the appellate process and not...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The Appellate Tribunal found that the PCIT's assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 was not justified. It observed that the assessment...

Revision u/s 263 - When the Assessing Officer after exhaustive deliberations had accepted the explanation of the assessee and refrained from drawing any adverse...

Revision u/s 263 - When the provision contained under Section 92CA(4) of the Act makes it mandatory upon the Assessing Officer to compute the total income of the...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Whether waiver of loan has been held to be capital receipt - the basis for assuming jurisdiction u/s. 263 of the Act is Note II to Schedule...

Revision u/s 263 - bogus purchase - proof of nexus between the purchases and sales - once submission/reply filed by the assessee, pursuant to enquiry by the Assessing...

Revision u/sec. 263 - CIT has exceeded his jurisdiction in directing the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

Revision u/s 263 - Validity of proceedings – CIT has no jurisdiction to direct the Assessing Officer to initiate proceedings u/s 201(1A) - AT

Revision u/s 263 - Once the valuation report has not been sent by the valuation officer to the assessing officer/assessee, within the period stipulated by the act that...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Jurisdiction exercised by ld PCIT under section 263 of the Act is not in accordance with law. PCIT has selected the item (share capital and...

Revision u/s 263 - CIT has merely directed the Assessing Officer to make an elaborate inquiry. - revision is not valid - AT

Determining the jurisdiction of appellate forum - jurisdiction of this Tribunal - The Tribunal refers to the legal precedent established in a Supreme Court case...

Quick Updates: