The petitioner has established that the revised assessment ...

VAT and Sales Tax

October 12, 2013

The petitioner has established that the revised assessment proceedings issued under Section 16(1)(a) of TNGST Act is statutorily barred by limitation and therefore the writ petition cannot be dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

The petitioner has established that the revised assessment ...

VAT and Sales Tax

October 12, 2013

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

Conduct of Assessment Proceedings electronically in time-barring scrutiny cases - Order u/s 119

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - It cannot be said that assessee has concealed the particular income with the meaning of section 271(1)(c) of the Act or there is not deep...

Re-assessment u/s 73(1) - there was no assessment order as such, there could not be a notice for re-assessment inasmuch as the question of re-assessment would arise only...

Revision u/s 263 - Assessment u/s 153C - revision of invalid assessment - the present proceedings being collateral proceedings and if the assessment order is inherently...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - income voluntarily offered before commencement of assessment proceedings - the time limit for furnishing the revised return of income u/s 139(5)...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - no original assessment order in the case of the assessee passed - Even assuming for the sake of argument that if an intimation under...

Validity of reopening of assessment - original proceedings for assessment were by way of an intimation under Section 143(1)(a)/143(1) - We find no legal infirmity in the...

TP Assessment proceedings - period of limitation - the proviso which has altered the original time limit from 24 months to 21 months vide amendment in Finance Act, 2006...

Allegation of corruption against the Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) - Irregularity in passing the assessment order - There can be no doubt with regard to the fact...

Validity of revised return 139(5) - Revised return did not conform to the prescription of section 139(5), before its substitution w.e.f. A.Y. 2017-18, which provided for...

Validity of revised return u/s 139(5) - return was revised after issuance of intimation u/s 143(1) - claim of benefit of excess set off of losses and carry forward of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) - The Tribunal noted that in a previous round of proceedings, a penalty under section 271(1)(b) of...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - by the time, assessment order for the assessment year 2004-05 was passed on 31.12.2010, six year period for reopening of...

Quick Updates: