Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When ...

AO Must Record Satisfaction u/s 271(1)(c) for Penalty; Omission Blocks Penalties for Undocumented Additions.

March 2, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in assessment order in respect of certain additions and not recorded in respect of certain other additions; it acts as a bar against levy of penalty U/s 271(1)(c) in respect of those additions in respect of which such satisfaction was not recorded in the assessment order or during the assessment proceedings

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When ...

AO Must Record Satisfaction u/s 271(1)(c) for Penalty; Omission Blocks Penalties for Undocumented Additions.

March 2, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - recording of satisfaction - penalty initiated u/s 143(3) order for concealment of particulars of income - penalty imposed for furnishing of...

HC ruled penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E require explicit satisfaction to be recorded by Assessing Officer during reassessment. Mere recording of...

The case involved a dispute over penalty imposition u/ss 271(1)(c) versus 271(1B) for additions related to estimated income from share trading transactions. The...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - recording of satisfaction - mere direction in the assessment order to initiate penalty proceedings - Concealment/furnishing inaccurate...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - There was the need for the AO to record the clear satisfaction with respect to each addition/disallowances made during the assessment proceedings...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - AO has not applied his mind before initiating the penalty proceedings rather borrowed his satisfaction from the “tax...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Quick Updates: