Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Concealment of income would have no ...

No Penalty for Concealed Income Without Tax Evasion u/s 271(1)(c); Disallowances Alone Don't Justify Penalties.

October 28, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Concealment of income would have no role to play and would not lead to tax evasion therefore, penalty cannot be imposed on the basis of the disallowance or additions made under regular provision - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Concealment of income would have no ...

No Penalty for Concealed Income Without Tax Evasion u/s 271(1)(c); Disallowances Alone Don't Justify Penalties.

October 28, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - AO has not applied his mind before initiating the penalty proceedings rather borrowed his satisfaction from the “tax...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of excessive depreciation - cost of acquisition of wind mill - whether or not assessee is entitled to the benefit under proviso to...

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Basis adopted during the assessment proceedings cannot be used in the penalty proceedings without following the due process. As such, to...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act is leviable to be imposed only where the assessee has concealed its particulars of income or furnished...

Validity of the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) or 158BFA - AO has levied the penalty under section 271(1)(C) of the Act by observing that the assessee has concealed/furnished...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The assessee cannot be accused of concealing his income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income as the disallowance has been made u/s 43B - AT

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - It cannot be said that assessee has concealed the particular income with the meaning of section 271(1)(c) of the Act or there is not deep...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Quick Updates: