Validity of Assessment made u/s 158BC – Warrant of authorization ...

Income Tax

January 7, 2014

Validity of Assessment made u/s 158BC – Warrant of authorization not issued in the name of assessee – CIT(A) committed an error in deleting the addition without considering the seized materials which were available on record - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of Assessment made u/s 158BC – Warrant of authorization ...

Income Tax

January 7, 2014

You may also like:

Assessment u/s 153A - Name not appearing on warrant or authorization (WOA) - search being authorized in the name of more than one person - decided against the assessee - AT

Validity of search warrant - notwithstanding that the authorization for search has been issued in joint names, assessment or reassessment shall be made separately in the...

For making assessment u/s. 158BC, it is not necessary to issue authorization u/s. 132 or make requisition u/s. 132A separately in the name of each person - Authorization...

Warrant issued in joint name - if an authorization has been issued under Section 132 or requisition under Section 132A in the name of more than one person, the...

Validity of block assessment u/s 158BC – Order beyond period of limitation or not –issuance of notice u/s.143(2) is a mandatory requirement - AT

Proceedings initiated u/s 158BC - there was no warrant authorization on the name of the assessee and hence, the Tribunal has found the assessment as ab initio void,...

Search u/s 132 is a person specific and not a premises specific - if the name of the assessee against whom the block assessment has been made, does not figure in the...

Authorization for search - Status of assessee - existence of AOP/BOI - evidence of existence - after the amendment of the Act by insertion of Section 292 CC with...

Block assessment - The notice u/s 158BC was issued by AO on 5th May, 2000, which was served on 08th May, 2000. The time limit for passing assessment for Block Period was...

Validity of assessment - the assessment order passed in the name of non-existent entity is invalid and subsequent proceedings arising there from are vitiated

Quick Updates: